Leselounge: Philipp Blom im Gespräch mit Günter Kaindlstorfer

One Comment

  1. Thank you. So as I understand it, you find the value of “progress with rescept to arts and the sciences” objectionable.The basis you’ve given is that it “manifested… in cultural, sexist, and racial elitism”. How is that a basis for objecting to the value of progress in science and the arts?It seems about as sensible as saying that Stalin’s atheism manifested in atrocities in Russia; and holding that forth as a reason to object to atheism.In other words, not sensible at all: you have yet to show how the values “manifested” as you claim, and further how that leads you to object to the values themselves.

Comments are closed.